Vaxx Update: Unveiling A Silent Threat - Is Avian Flu, Transformed (turbocharged) Using Gain-of-Function Research, Poised to Ignite a Catastrophic Pandemic?
The Alarming Consequences of Avian Influenza's "Weaponization" and the Unsettling Potential for a Devastating Global Outbreak...
“Weaponized Avian Flu”- Original Art by Sam Kephart using prompts with Craiyon.com
Gain-of-Function Research: Unveiling its Potential for Creating New Bio-Weapons
In recent years, gain-of-function (GoF) research has emerged as a controversial scientific field with profound implications for public health and global security.
While the intentions behind this type of research are supposedly “noble” (aiming to enhance our understanding of pathogens and proactively develop effective treatments), there’s a massive dark side to it. Let’s take a deep dive into the definition of gain of function research, explore its potential to create new bio-weapons, and discuss the ethical and security concerns associated with its pursuit.
Gain-of-function research involves the deliberate alteration or manipulation of a pathogen's genetic material to enhance its properties. The objective is to study how the pathogen could evolve naturally, allowing scientists to anticipate and prepare for potential future outbreaks. By modifying a virus or bacterium, researchers can explore its ability to infect humans, its transmission patterns, and the effectiveness of potential treatments or vaccines.
While gain-of-function research is ostensibly aimed at advancing “scientific knowledge”, the same research techniques and findings can and are being exploited for malevolent purposes. The term "dual-use dilemma" describes the inherent dual nature of the knowledge and technologies developed in this field. What might be a valuable tool for public health can also be repurposed to create a new generation of highly-advanced bio-weapons.
Through gain-of-function research, scientists can inadvertently or intentionally enhance the virulence, transmissibility, or resistance of a pathogen.
This raises concerns about the potential creation of bio-weapons that can cause widespread harm. By manipulating a pathogen's genetic code, researchers can engineer viruses or bacteria with enhanced capabilities, evading existing treatments and vaccines, and spreading rapidly among human and/or animal populations.
The pursuit of gain-of-function research requires careful ethical deliberation. Note… How well do you think that’s going??
Critics argue that the risks associated with creating potentially dangerous pathogens outweigh the potential benefits. (I thoroughly agree!) They stress the importance of prioritizing public safety over scientific curiosity. Do you trust the Powers-That-Be to strike the right balance between scientific progress and ethical responsibility so as to avoid unintended consequences and prevent the misuse of scientific knowledge?
The potential (and highly likely) weaponization of pathogens resulting from gain-of-function research poses significant security challenges. Safeguarding laboratories and preventing unauthorized access to research materials and knowledge becomes imperative.
Adequate regulation, robust biosecurity protocols, and stringent oversight are essential to ensure that these powerful scientific tools do not fall into the wrong hands.
Do you know the U.S. Department of Defense, through its Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s (DTRA) Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP) ALREADY funds and “sub-contracts” biological research in dozens of countries around the world?
I wonder what they are all up to? Has Congress ever “audited” these programs?
Recognizing the concerns surrounding gain-of-function research, the scientific community and governments all say they’ve taken steps to mitigate the associated risks. Improved international collaboration, the establishment of biosecurity standards, and transparent oversight mechanisms supposedly ensure responsible research practices and prevent misuse. Do you trust they can strike a safe balance between openness and security when navigating this complex landscape?
Obviously, gain-of-function research holds great potential for advancing our understanding of pathogens and preparing for future outbreaks. However, do the dual-use risk and the potential for misuse (including the hidden creation of new bio-weapons) outweigh any potential upside rewards? I say yes!
Much of our current cadre of public leadership around the world is provably corrupt and/or “controlled”… and therefore incapable of properly implementing the robust ethical frameworks, strong biosecurity measures, and responsible scientific practices needed to safely harness the benefits of gain-of-function research while minimizing the associated risks to global security and public health.
Attention! Beware of the imminent danger lurking within the realm of “global biosecurity.” This perilous path has been chosen as a primary strategy to pave the way for a totalitarian One World Government. Brace yourselves for the relentless waves of pandemics destined to plague our future. Disturbing reports emerging at this very moment indicate a chilling possibility: the emergence of a weaponized bird flu.
Once innocuous, avian influenza (H5N1) has traditionally posed no threat to humanity.
However, the tide turned when scientists, driven by their insatiable curiosity, began tampering with nature itself using gain-of-function research. Through their experiments, they succeeded in forging a sinister hybrid strain with the potential to unleash a devastating global pandemic. Shockingly, a portion of this dangerous research has been conducted within Pentagon-funded bio-laboratories situated in Ukraine.
The consequences of these actions have the potential to shatter our world as we know it. Stay vigilant, stay informed, and be prepared. The looming specter of a weaponized avian flu demands our attention and calls for swift action to protect ourselves and our loved ones.
In the midst of the awe-inspiring spectacle, J. Robert Oppenheimer, the brilliant mind behind the Manhattan Project and the acknowledged "father" of the atomic bomb, stood witness to the inaugural unleashing of a nuclear weapon on that fateful day, July 16, 1945. As the blinding light engulfed the horizon, a profound fragment of Hindu scripture resonated within his consciousness, encapsulating the gravity of the moment: "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
Please click on this headline for a link to the article…
WHO is building a narrative for a bird flu pandemic and is already working to ensure vaccines are available
Is the next Plandemic set to be an ‘Avian Flu hoax’ to further collapse the food supply and impose a global Vaxxport?
The FDA is very worried about the rumor mill. So much so that they are taking your taxpayer dollars to run a "Rumor Control" department. This was created during the pandemic to take on "rumors" about who should and should not take the COVID-19 vaccine. Would we call this censorship??
CIA-MI6-MOSSAD Conducting Blackops and Terrorist Attacks in India Because of New Delhi’s Avid Support of Russia
Like I said in my essay:
NIH Warned of ‘Biosafety Concerns’ at Wuhan Lab Where COVID-19 May Have Originated
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/nih-warned-of-biosafety-concerns-at-wuhan-lab-where-covid-19-may-have-originated_5291978.html
The Nunn Lugar act was passed in 2005 (06?), to clean up the left over bio hazard labs… Nunn Lugar and Obama visited the Ukraine, together in 2004. Double party decades of planning. …”However, the tide turned when scientists, driven by their insatiable curiosity, began tampering with nature itself using gain-of-function research. Through their experiments, they succeeded in forging a sinister hybrid strain with the potential to unleash a devastating global pandemic. Shockingly, a portion of this dangerous research has been conducted within Pentagon-funded bio-laboratories situated in Ukraine