Can anyone else see that the "globalists" want to use an ongoing and ginned-up health (or other) emergency to force odious restrictions and a "One-World Government" reset solution as the answer?
Based on my research, as specifically applied to C-19 and the “vaccine”, many hospitals, doctors, and clinics have received undisclosed back-end capitation fees, bonuses, and other incentives to co-opt them into the “pushing” of the Vaxx/Jab official narrative. There have been huge financial incentives for much of the healthcare delivery system.
In an ecosystem of voluntary exchange (unregulated, unrestricted), a product or service is chosen if the buyer expects it will yield subjective benefits over the cost.
The pharmacist or doctor doesn't profit from sickness, he profits from healing.
You could just as well complain that a filling station "profits from empty gas tanks".
Or that an alarm company "profits from crime".
Unless you can show them causing the illness, they're not profiting from illness.
Yes it's harmful to sell ineffective medical interventions, but, caveat emptor. If you're not being compelled to take it, and the product isn't fraudulently mislabeled - tough luck. Your responsibility.
What leads the article - covid 'passports' is the opposite, it's force. Tyranny. And that applies to vaccine and genetic-transfection product mandates, mask mandates, lockdowns as well.
...
The problem of the modern age is much more 'you must do X' than 'would you like to buy Y?'
Based on my research, as specifically applied to C-19 and the “vaccine”, many hospitals, doctors, and clinics have received undisclosed back-end capitation fees, bonuses, and other incentives to co-opt them into the “pushing” of the Vaxx/Jab official narrative. There have been huge financial incentives for much of the healthcare delivery system.
Thanks for the article!
I'll disagree with your last picture/meme though.
In an ecosystem of voluntary exchange (unregulated, unrestricted), a product or service is chosen if the buyer expects it will yield subjective benefits over the cost.
The pharmacist or doctor doesn't profit from sickness, he profits from healing.
You could just as well complain that a filling station "profits from empty gas tanks".
Or that an alarm company "profits from crime".
Unless you can show them causing the illness, they're not profiting from illness.
Yes it's harmful to sell ineffective medical interventions, but, caveat emptor. If you're not being compelled to take it, and the product isn't fraudulently mislabeled - tough luck. Your responsibility.
What leads the article - covid 'passports' is the opposite, it's force. Tyranny. And that applies to vaccine and genetic-transfection product mandates, mask mandates, lockdowns as well.
...
The problem of the modern age is much more 'you must do X' than 'would you like to buy Y?'