Whether you’ve had a COVID-19 Vaxx injection or a natural infection, you likely have dangerous spike protein remaining in your tissues and organs, including your brain.
I share information… I’m not into trying to change existing opinions.
The “bio weapon” here is indeed the Spike Protein… it’s the ultimate “troublemaker” here. It’s what irritates the the lining of the cardiovascular 🫀 system, etc.
I’m sorry if you hold a different view.
You will need to do more of your own due diligence…
I got the pfizer shedding from giving my neighbors a ride on 6/23/2021 they both took 1 and 2 shots of pfizer, I still have massive headaches, my period is never the same with some clots, right eye floaters, I now need to wear glasses to read anything, night sweat, feeling tired and weak, it feels like my days are numbered, stay out of cars with them warn everyone you know
Be very cautious about recommending and/or using N-acetyl cysteine, as there are documented effects NAC has on prolonging, and thus promoting, cancers. Here is an overview article:
"Here's the good part: the animals who got NAC supplementation really did show significantly fewer of those signs of oxidative damage in their lung tissue. It also reduced signs of cell senescence and overt histological damage of aging as well, such as emphysema lesions (all of these were markedly worse in the JunD knockouts, but NAC improved them as well). So far, so good, and this is exactly the case you'd make if you were pitching NAC as something people should take for healthy lungs as they age. But hold on.
"None of the aged normal mice showed signs of adenocarcinoma developing in their lung tissue. But 10% of the aged normals getting NAC supplementation showed it. None of the aged JudD knockouts showed any, either, but **50%** of the aged JunD knockouts getting the NAC supplementation had it. The best guess is that cell senescence pathway that seemed to be inhibited with the NAC: some of these are in fact cells that should have died and didn't, and went on to become cancerous:
—"Our results therefore support a direct role for NAC in tumor initiation. This role seems independent from antioxidant gene expression, since opposite variations in antioxidant enzyme expression were seen in healthy mice and JunD–/– mice during aging. The protective effect of NAC against lung emphysema is an expected consequence of the decrease in lung senescent-cell accumulation. Altering the cell senescence process, however, may produce undesirable consequences, since senes- cent cells are well known to constitute a barrier to cell transformation and tumorigenesis.—
"Now that's something to think about, isn't it? It comes with the usual caveats about mouse models, but it ties in with the other reports that cancer is a complex enough situation that trying to prevent it (or treat it) with antioxidants is ill-advised at the very least. All of our cellular processes involve tradeoffs, and we've had a billion years or two for them to come into balance. Now, we may not agree with some of the equilibria we've reached, but we need to have a better understanding of all these checks and balances before we go in messing around with them. For example, I find longevity research very interesting indeed, and many of us would prefer to live longer than evolution cares about us living, but lifespan is a tradeoff between several other factors, too (one of which is the eventual development of cancer)."
This is the cited article from the Science.org brief:
"The antioxidant N-acetylcysteine protects from lung emphysema but induces lung adenocarcinoma in mice"
⏩A key takeaway: If you have followed Walter Chesnut's Substack postings on how SARS-CoV-2 Spike relates to aging and senescence (e.g.: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/friday-hope-fasting-removing-senescent), then you can start to see a connection here. Namely, recommending NAC is ⚠counterproductive⚠ when the goal is detoxifying from the effects of Spike-induced damage to the body. NAC mitigates cellular senescence, and thus allows damaged cells to continue functioning —so if the cell has become cancerous and would ordinarily signal to the rest of the body that it needs destruction, it won't undertake this process but instead continue growing and metastasizing. Keeping around these senescent cells will harm one's overall inflammatory response, as the body will have to respond to new infections and cellular aging along with these cells that NAC has grandfathered in.
㊙"You will need to do more of your own due diligence..."
Can anyone explain the relevance of furin cleavage to vax detox? Does the vax code for a cleavage site and would cleavage be a good or bad thing overall?
This is all starting to get very messy!! I read that spike from infection does not get into the blood so how does it cause all of these issues in infected?? How long after having infection could one detox?? We had it past Nov and at the time no one was suggesting detox for us. We did treat using IVM and FLCCC protocol plus three in a few other things from McCollugh and Dr Z.
I share information… I’m not into trying to change existing opinions.
The “bio weapon” here is indeed the Spike Protein… it’s the ultimate “troublemaker” here. It’s what irritates the the lining of the cardiovascular 🫀 system, etc.
I’m sorry if you hold a different view.
You will need to do more of your own due diligence…
Thank you for reading and responding.
I got the pfizer shedding from giving my neighbors a ride on 6/23/2021 they both took 1 and 2 shots of pfizer, I still have massive headaches, my period is never the same with some clots, right eye floaters, I now need to wear glasses to read anything, night sweat, feeling tired and weak, it feels like my days are numbered, stay out of cars with them warn everyone you know
Can you be infected by kissing someone who's been jabbed twice (I'm unvaxxed) ?
Be very cautious about recommending and/or using N-acetyl cysteine, as there are documented effects NAC has on prolonging, and thus promoting, cancers. Here is an overview article:
"N-Acetyl Cysteine: A Warning Shot"
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/n-acetyl-cysteine-warning-shot
"Here's the good part: the animals who got NAC supplementation really did show significantly fewer of those signs of oxidative damage in their lung tissue. It also reduced signs of cell senescence and overt histological damage of aging as well, such as emphysema lesions (all of these were markedly worse in the JunD knockouts, but NAC improved them as well). So far, so good, and this is exactly the case you'd make if you were pitching NAC as something people should take for healthy lungs as they age. But hold on.
"None of the aged normal mice showed signs of adenocarcinoma developing in their lung tissue. But 10% of the aged normals getting NAC supplementation showed it. None of the aged JudD knockouts showed any, either, but **50%** of the aged JunD knockouts getting the NAC supplementation had it. The best guess is that cell senescence pathway that seemed to be inhibited with the NAC: some of these are in fact cells that should have died and didn't, and went on to become cancerous:
—"Our results therefore support a direct role for NAC in tumor initiation. This role seems independent from antioxidant gene expression, since opposite variations in antioxidant enzyme expression were seen in healthy mice and JunD–/– mice during aging. The protective effect of NAC against lung emphysema is an expected consequence of the decrease in lung senescent-cell accumulation. Altering the cell senescence process, however, may produce undesirable consequences, since senes- cent cells are well known to constitute a barrier to cell transformation and tumorigenesis.—
"Now that's something to think about, isn't it? It comes with the usual caveats about mouse models, but it ties in with the other reports that cancer is a complex enough situation that trying to prevent it (or treat it) with antioxidants is ill-advised at the very least. All of our cellular processes involve tradeoffs, and we've had a billion years or two for them to come into balance. Now, we may not agree with some of the equilibria we've reached, but we need to have a better understanding of all these checks and balances before we go in messing around with them. For example, I find longevity research very interesting indeed, and many of us would prefer to live longer than evolution cares about us living, but lifespan is a tradeoff between several other factors, too (one of which is the eventual development of cancer)."
This is the cited article from the Science.org brief:
"The antioxidant N-acetylcysteine protects from lung emphysema but induces lung adenocarcinoma in mice"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795405/
Here are other articles reporting similar findings, along with descriptions for proposed mechanisms for actions for what's occurring:
"N-Acetyl-L-cysteine Promotes Ex Vivo Growth and Expansion of Single Circulating Tumor Cells by Mitigating Cellular Stress Responses"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925378/
"N-Acetylcysteine Promotes Metastatic Spread of Melanoma in Mice"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331881/
"Chronic treatment with N-acetyl-cystein delays cellular senescence in endothelial cells isolated from a subgroup of atherosclerotic patients"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701585/
⏩A key takeaway: If you have followed Walter Chesnut's Substack postings on how SARS-CoV-2 Spike relates to aging and senescence (e.g.: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/friday-hope-fasting-removing-senescent), then you can start to see a connection here. Namely, recommending NAC is ⚠counterproductive⚠ when the goal is detoxifying from the effects of Spike-induced damage to the body. NAC mitigates cellular senescence, and thus allows damaged cells to continue functioning —so if the cell has become cancerous and would ordinarily signal to the rest of the body that it needs destruction, it won't undertake this process but instead continue growing and metastasizing. Keeping around these senescent cells will harm one's overall inflammatory response, as the body will have to respond to new infections and cellular aging along with these cells that NAC has grandfathered in.
㊙"You will need to do more of your own due diligence..."
Wise advice!
Can anyone explain the relevance of furin cleavage to vax detox? Does the vax code for a cleavage site and would cleavage be a good or bad thing overall?
Do you have to take all of this?? What if you had covid 8 months ago?? We didn’t know then to use this stuff??
This is all starting to get very messy!! I read that spike from infection does not get into the blood so how does it cause all of these issues in infected?? How long after having infection could one detox?? We had it past Nov and at the time no one was suggesting detox for us. We did treat using IVM and FLCCC protocol plus three in a few other things from McCollugh and Dr Z.
Thank you!