Vaxx Update: The World Health Organization's (WHO) Growing Influence - A Clear and Present Danger to Sovereign Nations
Examining the Concerns of Supernumerary Powers and the Potential Risks of a De Facto 'One World Government'
“The WHO Trojan Horse” - Original art by Sam Kephart using prompts with Craiyon.com
The WHO's Bio-Safety Agenda: A Trojan Horse for Global Governance?
In an increasingly interconnected world, global health organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) play a vital role in coordinating responses to public health emergencies. However, recent developments have raised concerns about the WHO's growing transnational influence, particularly regarding bio-safety measures. Some worry that the organization's actions in this domain could potentially morph into a de facto "one world government" and undermine national sovereignty.
Imagine a scenario where an organization with immense global influence uses a seemingly benign cause as a “trojan horse” to exert control over countries and undermine their sovereignty. That’s a MAJOR concern being raised now about the WHO and its bio-safety initiatives. On the surface, the WHO's efforts to ensure bio-safety appear commendable. After all, preventing the spread of dangerous pathogens and ensuring global health security are crucial goals. However, we must critically examine the implications of the WHO's increasing involvement in this domain.
One of the fears surrounding the WHO's bio-safety agenda is that it may give rise to an organization that has the power to control and suppress nations through its aggressive use of “health treaties.”
As the WHO gains influence over countries' policies and practices related to bio-safety, it could (and is almost certain to) dictate how nations manage outbreaks and respond to public health emergencies. This level of control could extend beyond health matters, encroaching upon broader areas of governance.
The WHO's growing transnational influence is another cause for alarm. As an international organization, the WHO should strive to represent the collective interests of member states. However, there are concerns that the organization is increasingly being influenced by powerful countries and non-state actors, which may push their own agendas onto the global stage. This can lead to decisions that favor certain nations over others and result in a loss of balance and fairness in global health governance.
Mission creep refers to the gradual expansion of an organization's goals and activities beyond its original mandate. Critics argue that the WHO's bio-safety agenda is an example of mission creep, as the organization moves into areas that go beyond its primary responsibility of coordinating global health efforts. By taking on a broader role in bio-safety, the WHO is very willingly overstepping its boundaries and becoming an intrusive force in the governance of sovereign nations.
Once an organization gains a foothold in areas beyond its initial mandate, it becomes easier for it to expand further, potentially morphing into a de facto "one world government." The concerns about the WHO's bio-safety agenda must be seen in this context.
In my opinion, as the WHO continues to amass influence and control over nations’ bio-safety measures, it will continue to encroach upon and erode citizens’ rights traditionally governed by sovereign member states. This slippery slope is already leading to a loss of national autonomy and democratic decision-making.
While the World Health Organization ostensibly plays a crucial role in global health governance, it’s almost guaranteed its bio-safety agenda will morph into a de facto "one world government.” I sure as hell don’t want some proven Marxist son-of-a-bitch, like the current head of WHO, governing my rights and telling me what to do INSIDE the United States of America. That’s overt insanity!
This erosion of national sovereignty and the potential for control and suppression of countries’ citizens are valid clear and present dangers.
We’ve got to remain informed and vigilant… and demand our elected leaders hold open discussions about the role and limits of global health organizations, prior to ratifying any bio-safety treaties, to ensure a balance between international cooperation and national sovereignty.
Please click on the following graphics for links to their respective articles…
CV19 Bioweapon Catastrophe is Murder – Dr. Pierre Kory
Dr. Janci Lindsay, Ph.D. - The DNA Plasmids Infect The E. coli In The Digestive Tract And Turn It Into A Non-Stop Spike Factory... Which Will Kill You, Sooner Or Later
Bacterial Plasmid (in the C-19 jabs) explained
Please click on this graphic for a link to the article…
Vaxx Facts Resources: The Vaxx Updates are "pushing" the limits of length for Substack, so I'm making the Resources section its own ongoing linked site. Note: I do ADD new resources, as needed.
How to remove graphene oxide from your body How Bad Is My Batch? Why, Even If You've Had COVID, You're Likely To Catch It Again Protection From Vaxx Shedding Top Medical Experts Share Proven Protocols Holy Grail of COVID-19 Spike Protein Detoxification
If you want to understand the REAL geopolitical backstory that sets a context for ALL the shit we’re experiencing now, I suggest you take an hour to watch this video interview (made YEARS ago) with the late Aaron Russo:
Safe (?) Regulatory Limits !(?) UNIMAGINABLE: another article I read said in 1961 these Contaminates were “regulated illegal” after finding them in both polio vaccines. ——1961: —— I no longer imagine living on a planet, in a country, “governed” by anything-one- that cares for humans, a humane human family. (This whole newsletter is filled with, ghastly, horrifying Human Health (!?!) news stories. …The base formulation for chemotherapy mustard gas, retrieved from unlaunched war heads after WWI, presidentially mortifying.) …”The level of contamination varies depending on the platform used to measure it, but no matter which method is used, the level of DNA contamination is significantly higher than the — — —regulatory limits— —— in both ‘Europe and the U.S.’ The highest level of DNA contamination found was 30%.”