Vaxx Update: The World Health Organization's (WHO) Digital Health Certification - A Step Towards Global Control?
The Clear and Present Danger Surrounding WHO's Ambitious Agenda...
“WHO’s Digital Health Pass” - Original art by Sam Kephart using prompts with Craiyon.com
In recent years, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been pushing for a global Digital Health Certification, raising eyebrows and stirring debates about the potential consequences.
While the idea of a standardized digital health system seems logical and beneficial at first blush, I remain convinced it’s a “Trojan Horse” that’s paving the way for the WHO to become the power center of a One World Government.
Let’s explore the clear and present dangers associated with the WHO's ambitious agenda. First and foremost, let's address the concerns surrounding the concentration of power.
The WHO's proposed Digital Health Certification would require countries to comply with specific guidelines and regulations, effectively centralizing control over healthcare systems worldwide.
There’s ZERO doubt in my mind this concentration of power will lead to a loss of national sovereignty, as decisions regarding healthcare policies and practices would increasingly be dictated by a supernumerary international body. This scenario will infringe upon the rights of individual nations to govern their own healthcare systems according to their unique needs and priorities.
Further, the potential for data privacy breaches and unauthorized surveillance cannot be ignored.
A global Digital Health Certification necessitates the collection and sharing of sensitive health data on a massive scale.
While proponents argue this data would be protected, the reality is that NO system is foolproof.
With increasing cyber threats and the possibility of unauthorized access or outright fraud, there’s legitimate concern that personal health information could fall into the wrong hands. Furthermore, the potential for surveillance and tracking raises concerns about individual privacy and the erosion of civil liberties.
Critics also point out the potential for monopolistic control over healthcare technologies. With the WHO acting as the arbiter of digital health certification, there is a risk of favoritism towards certain technology providers. (Yah think?) This could stifle innovation and competition, ultimately limiting the choices available to healthcare systems and patients alike. The concentration of power in the hands of a single global entity would no doubt hinder the development of localized, context-specific solutions that better suit the needs of diverse populations.
Given that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely… I’m a flat-out NO and I’m against the United States ratifying the inception of the WHO's Digital Health Certification.
While standardizing global healthcare systems seems appealing, we’ve got to consider the potential risks and unintended consequences.
It’s crucial to ensure any global initiatives prioritize transparency, democratic decision-making, and respect for national sovereignty. (Fat chance of that happening!)
Most folks are asleep at the switch on this topic… and I greatly fear our US Congress will ratify America’s participation in this looming scheme WITHOUT engaging in extensive open debate regarding state sovereignty and individual rights versus the WHO’s digital agenda.
G20 Signs Declaration for International Vaccine Passport
Vaxx Facts Resources: The Vaxx Updates are "pushing" the limits of length for Substack, so I'm making the Resources section its own ongoing linked site. Note: I do ADD new resources, as needed.
How to remove graphene oxide from your body How Bad Is My Batch? Why, Even If You've Had COVID, You're Likely To Catch It Again Protection From Vaxx Shedding Top Medical Experts Share Proven Protocols Holy Grail of COVID-19 Spike Protein Detoxification
The Speech That Likely Got JFK Assassinated…
“ In a recent article on the War in Ukraine, I discussed how, like many others, I have observed that over and over again, once people occupy a certain position of power in the government or corporations, a certain degree of sociopathic thought emerges where they stop caring about the human costs of fulfilling their objectives (such as making more money). Because of this, I have always followed a rule given to me—don’t invest in death.
Friends and relatives throughout their lives have seen countless cases where human suffering or death resulted from investors looking to make a profit without thinking of the human consequences of their actions (e.g., funding mercenaries, investing in defense contractors, or investing in food commodities and thereby making them too expensive for the poor to afford). While there may be some skepticism to this claim, I, my teachers, who I trust the judgment of, and famous figures throughout history (e.g., Rudolph Steiner) sincerely believed there were real spiritual consequences if an individual left their money with someone who would use it for evil.” A Midwest Doctor from the Forgotten Side of Medicine
De-Clasified. No charges in t-rump brought paperwork home, were filed in voluntary returned. Only the the ones he forgot to return. “I forgot to declassify them.” Scum