Vaxx Update: How can anyone in their right mind 'square' the differences between the "official C-19 vaccine & booster rollout narrative" with the mounting negative evidence attached below?
Even if only a fraction of the articles we curate and re-publish here are true, 'the Jab campaign' is a friggin' medical nightmare runaway freight train. Kudos to co-researcher Gabi for her shares.
Get a load of this liquified crap…
‘Negative Efficacy’ Should Have Stopped COVID Vaccine Recommendations in Their Tracks
Recently, various health agencies around the world have approved and are actively pushing for another COVID booster shot, meant to enhance the vaccine efficacy against a COVID-19 infection.
However, many studies have found that the boosters do not make a significant difference in protection, especially in terms of protection against reinfection. In fact, the latest data shows vaccine efficacy against the coronavirus tends to even drop into the negatives after just a few months.
It is a well-known fact that COVID vaccine effectiveness wanes quickly as time goes on; this is confirmed by countless studies.
Although the official narrative for COVID-19 vaccines nowadays only emphasizes their efficacy in protection against ICU admission and death rates, it actually implies the indisputable fact that vaccines don’t protect, contrary to their design, against infection or even symptomatic infection, especially after the emergence of various Omicron variants.
Even the protection two shots offer against hospitalization drops to about 40 percent after less than a year. It’s actually looking worse for protection against severe symptoms, as efficacy rates seem to drop into the negatives about five months into complete vaccination.
When a vaccine’s efficacy drops into the negatives, it means that vaccination actually elevates the risks of hospitalization and severe diseases rather than reducing the risks. In simple terms, it does more harm than good when the efficacy is negative.
During the time prior to the pandemic, any vaccine with an efficacy of less than 50 percent would be regarded as a poor product.
When a product shows negative efficacy, it should be banned.
It seems that the pandemic isn’t only bad for our health and tugging at our common sense.
COVID-19 “Vaccines” Declining Usefulness
Please click on this image for a link to the article…
(Shutterstock)
The next two articles were shared by reader Rhonda:
Billions of lives could be in danger due to the COVID-19 vaccines, a Japanese professor says
At a press conference for bereaved families held on 25 November, Dr. Masanori Fukushima, Professor Emeritus at Kyoto University, warned about Covid injection harms:
“Given the wide range of adverse events, billions of lives could ultimately be in danger … You spend trillions of yen importing and inciting the population [to have it] … In professional magazines, the misunderstanding has come to light and now it is understood how dangerous it is.”
Please click on this image for a link to the article and video… (4:49)
Banking on a Shot in the Dark
Story at-a-glance
In recent months, two Pfizer officials have bragged about moving vaccine science forward at a speed that disallows proper scientific protocols from being followed, and the release of reformulated mRNA COVID boosters without testing is now the norm
In November 2022, the recently retired head of vaccine R&D at Pfizer, Kathrin Jansen, said “we flew the airplane while we were still building it. We couldn’t wait for data, we had to do so much at risk.” Pfizer compressed its vaccine development timeline from 10 years to a mere nine months by simultaneously developing and testing the product in human trials
Pfizer and other COVID jab makers hid side effects by eliminating the control groups long before the studies were over
Vaccine makers are readying to release other mRNA shots, many of which are being fast-tracked and predicted to receive authorization in months rather than years. Moderna is working on a three-in-one shot for COVID, flu, and RSV (respiratory syncytial virus), and they seem to expect to release it before clinical trials are finished
Pfizer quoted and relied on data from Israel when it sought approval from the FDA, and as it turns out, the Israeli government hid information about side effects. It didn’t even implement its surveillance system until a year after the shots rolled out, and when the data were analyzed, researchers concluded there were causative links between certain side effects and the jabs
They Did Everything at YOUR Risk
Please click on this image for a link to the article and video…
A Look Inside the COVID Vaccines and the Blood of the Vaccinated
Are unlisted ingredients in these vaccines proprietary secrets or unintentional contaminants?
More than 12.7 billion doses of the COVID-19 vaccine have been administered since the treatment became available nearly two years ago. Some have received one or two doses, while others have had multiple doses. Yet many don’t know what these shots actually contain.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website provides ingredient lists for curious consumers to consider. For example, vials from Moderna and BioNTech/Pfizer famously contain messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA). This is a genetic sequence designed to program your cells to manufacture a spike protein, thereby training the immune system to guard against the signature spike of the COVID-19 virus in the wild.
Less well-known ingredients include a different mix of lipids (fats). Pfizer’s shot, for example, contains 4-hydroxybutyl, and Moderna’s contains SM-102. These shots also include polyethylene glycol, cholesterol, a few salts (such as potassium chloride and sodium chloride), and sucrose (sugar).
Johnson and Johnson’s (Janssen’s) vaccine doesn’t contain mRNA but instead features as its main mechanism of immune system training a recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Like its mRNA counterparts mentioned above, the J&J vaccine contains a variety of other chemicals, such as citric acid monohydrate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, ethanol, 2 hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin, polysorbate-80, and sodium chloride.
Several items on the list of these publicly disclosed ingredients, such as mRNA and SM-102, come with controversy. Public health officials, regulators, and drug makers have been quick to defend these ingredients as safe and necessary to ensure the vaccines’ effectiveness.
Experts have also been quick to quash fears that the vaccines may contain other, even more, questionable components not disclosed to the public.
Please click on this image for a link to this extensive article…
Figure 4: These 4 images illustrate the variety of unusual phenomena and objects found in the blood of subjects vaccinated with Comirnaty (BioNTech/Pfizer). (German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis (GWG))
Further investigation into the nature of COVID-19 and how fatal it is on its own.
China Deploys Riot Police in Effort to Smother COVID-19 Protests
Is 'Desire to Conquer' Behind Pentagon-Affiliated Biolabs in Ukraine & Indonesia?
The 'Vaccine' BioWeapon Is Entirely A DOD Product
How Bad Is My Batch?
Protection From Vaxx Shedding Top Medical Experts Share Proven Protocols
709KB ∙ PDF File