Signal Sabotage? Was Goldberg's "Accidental" Invite a Deep State Takedown?
Unpacking the Houthi Texts: Did a "Mistake" Expose Trump's War Plans... or Was it a Calculated Attack?
The narrative is simple: Trump's administration "accidentally" included The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, in a Signal chat discussing sensitive Houthi war plans.
A comical blunder, right?
A national security breach that paints the administration as incompetent.
But what if it's not that simple?
What if this "accident" was a meticulously orchestrated maneuver?
Let's dissect the facts.
Michael Waltz, the National Security Advisor, initiated the Signal group. He, of all people, should understand the gravity of secure communications. Yet, Goldberg, a progressive/left journalist known for his critical stance towards the administration, somehow slipped into this inner circle.
"Inadvertently," they claim.
But consider this:
The Timing: The leak conveniently surfaces amidst heightened tensions and critical policy debates. Was this a calculated attempt to derail specific decisions or undermine the administration's credibility at a crucial moment?
Goldberg's "Inclusion": The idea a seasoned national security team would "accidentally" add a prominent journalist to such a sensitive group strains credulity. Is it more likely that someone intended for Goldberg to see these discussions?
The "Damage Control": The administration's downplaying of the incident raises further questions. If it was a mere mistake, why not address the security implications head-on? Could the minimal response be a cover-up for something more sinister?
Is it possible that elements within the "Deep State" – those opposed to the administration's policies – orchestrated this leak?
Could Waltz, or someone using his name, have intentionally included Goldberg, knowing the potential for explosive exposure?
The text messages themselves, detailing strategic discussions and internal disagreements, paint a picture of an administration at odds. This could be precisely what an adversary, internal or external, wanted to expose. The resulting chaos and distrust serve to weaken the administration's position.
The official narrative of an "accidental" inclusion is convenient, but it simply doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
We must ask:
Who benefits from this leak?
Who had the means and the motive to orchestrate such a breach?
This isn't just about a security blunder.
It's about the potential for calculated sabotage, a deliberate attempt to undermine the Trump administration from within.
The "accident" may be the perfect cover for a far more insidious agenda.
The public deserves answers.
Was this a mistake, or was it a calculated attack?
Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal
White House blasts Atlantic reporter in Signal leak as new messages revealed
Trump team can’t argue these messages weren’t classified — of course they were!
Trump admin declares the Atlantic's Signal article a 'hoax' after it drops 'war plans' rhetoric
Trump downplays national security team texting military operation plan on Signal as a minor ‘glitch’
Signal issues statement after Trump administration chat leak: 'Gold standard'
Trump Admin Accidentally Texted Jeffrey Goldberg Their War Plans
'Some really sh*tty war plans': Pete Hegseth erupts over latest leak disclosure
White House security leak: who’s who in the Signal group chat
How NATO Provoked Russia in Ukraine and Undermined Peace
From the NY Sun:
"With some Republicans brushing off serious concerns about journalist Jeffrey Goldberg’s inclusion in a Signal group chat discussing military strikes in Yemen, many anti-war conservatives who have embraced the new isolationist America First foreign policy are placing blame for the fiasco on one man — national security advisor Michael Waltz, who was responsible for adding Mr. Goldberg to the chat earlier this month.
Some America Firsters have long been concerned about Mr. Waltz’s commitment to what is described as a “realist” foreign policy agenda of the new administration given his support for keeping American military forces in Afghanistan and his unabashed support for Ukraine after Russia’s invasion. While he was serving in the military, Mr. Waltz was an advisor to Secretary Rumsfeld and Vice President Cheney — two men often derided by President Trump for their foreign policy decisions."
Waltz is trying to sabotage Trump on behalf of the Deep State... period.
Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, is a well-known, long-standing, and acknowledged "Neocon."
Waltz was an advisor to two (2) of the most Deep State-tied Neocons, Rumsfeld & Cheney.
Waltz needs to be drop-kicked from the Administration immediately; he's a traitor to Trump and now a proven Deep State "cutout."
https://ikno-this.com/understanding-neoconservatism-what-is-a-neocon/
The rats are everywhere